Elevated hunting blind

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure provides a hunting blind. The hunting blind, in one embodiment, includes a base structure configured to support the weight of a human. The hunting blind, in this embodiment, further includes one or more sidewall structures coupleable to the base structure, wherein the one or more sidewall structures include a first portion extending upwardly from the base structure, and a second portion that slants outwardly from the first portion. The hunting blind, in this embodiment, further includes a roof structure positioned over the base structure and coupled to the second portion.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This Application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/689,124 filed on Jan. 18, 2010, entitled Elevated Hunting Blind, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/583,472 filed on Jan. 5, 2012, entitled Elevated Hunting Blind, both of which are commonly assigned with the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure is directed, in general to a hunting blind and more specifically, to an elevated hunting blind.

BACKGROUND

Over the years, various configurations of hunting blinds have developed. Such blinds are conventionally used either on the ground or often as elevated stands. Most often, these blinds are attached in some manner to an elevated structure (e.g., a selected tree or post) and provide some type of frame work to which a camouflage curtain is attached to prevent detection by the wildlife being hunted.

Such blinds were traditionally used to observe and hunt various different types of wild game with a firearm. However, with the ever increasing popularity of bow and arrow hunting, said blinds have of late been equally used to hunt wild game with a bow. Unfortunately, the traditional blinds were designed with the firearm hunter's needs and desires in mind, including the ability to shoot the wild game at greater distances, as opposed to the bow and arrow hunter's needs and desires in mind, including the need to accommodate shorter distance shots. Moreover, the traditional blinds were designed such that a bow hunter could not draw the bow within the enclosure of the blind, while aiming at an animal below the blind, without the riser of the bow hitting the roof or sidewall structures.

Accordingly, what is desired in the art is an elevated hunting blind that addresses the problems experienced by bow and arrow hunters.

SUMMARY

To address the above-discussed deficiencies of the prior art, the present disclosure provides a hunting blind. The hunting blind, in one embodiment, includes a base structure configured to support the weight of a human. The hunting blind, in this embodiment, further includes one or more sidewall structures coupleable to the base structure, wherein the one or more sidewall structures include a first portion extending upwardly from the base structure, and a second portion that slants outwardly from the first portion. The hunting blind, in this embodiment, further includes a roof structure positioned over the base structure and coupled to the second portion.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a hunting blind manufactured in accordance with this disclosure;

FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind;

FIG. 3 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind;

FIG. 4 illustrates the hunting blind of FIG. 1, further including an optional and detachable elevating structure coupled to the base structure;

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment wherein the hunting blind is elevated using a ladder stand to elevate it above ground level;

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment wherein the hunting blind is configured to couple directly to a tree or post;

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment wherein the hunting blind substantially surrounds a tree or post; and

FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring initially to FIG. 1, illustrated is a hunting blind 100 manufactured in accordance with this disclosure. The term hunting blind, as used herein, refers to structure used to observe, photograph, or hunt animals in an outdoor setting. Accordingly, the term hunting blind should not be limited to only those situations wherein a firearm, bow or cross-bow are being used, but can equally extend to the use for nature observing and photography. Nevertheless, a hunting blind as described herein is particularly useful for hunting wild game, and more particularly useful for hunting wild game with a bow and arrow. It should additionally be noted that the phrase “bow and arrow”, as used herein, includes traditional long bows, compound bows, re-curved bows, cross-bows, amongst others.

The hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1 initially includes a base structure 110. The base structure 110, in this embodiment, is configured to support the weight of a human. Accordingly, the base structure 110, in this embodiment, should be of sufficient strength to support hundreds of pounds of weight bearing down thereon. In one embodiment, the base structure 110 is comprised of a metal exterior with metal support crossbars. Likewise, the base structure 110 may have a wood, composite, or metal foot plate, among others, attached to the metal exterior and metal support crossbars. Nevertheless, those skilled in the art understand that other materials, such as wood, fiberglass, polymer, etc. may be used, presuming they provide the requisite strength and support.

The hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1 further includes one or more sidewall structures 120 coupled to the base structure 110. In this embodiment, at least a portion of the one or more sidewall structures 120 are configured to slant outwardly from the base structure 110. Likewise, while one embodiment exists wherein all of the one or more sidewalls slant outwardly, other embodiments exist wherein less than all sidewalls slant outwardly. For example, the one or more sidewall structures 120 of the embodiment of FIG. 1 are configured to markedly slant outward from the base structure 110, so as to facilitate the uninhibited shooting of a bow and arrow, firearm, camera, etc., no matter the distance or proximity of the relevant animal to the blind. This includes those situations wherein the animal is quite close to the base of the blind. Accordingly, in one embodiment the one or more sidewall structures 120 slant outward from the base structure 110 by at least 10 degrees. In yet another embodiment, the one or more sidewall structures 120 slant outward from the base structure 110 by at least 30 degrees, and in yet another embodiment the one or more sidewall structures 120 slant outward from the base structure 110 by up to about 60 degrees. It should be noted that the greater the degree of slant of the one or more sidewall structures 120, the greater the ability of the human located therein to shoot (e.g., whether with a firearm, a bow and arrow, photography equipment) an animal near the base of the hunting blind 100.

The one or more sidewall structures 120 may comprise either a rigid material, such as metal, wood, polymer, etc. or alternatively may comprise a non rigid material (e.g., conforming material) such as fabric, plastic, etc. In those instances wherein the hunting blind 100 is a stationary structure exposed to the elements of the wild for extended periods of time, it could be best that the one or more sidewall structures 120 comprise the more rigid and thus more durable materials. However, in those instances wherein the hunting blind 100 is portable, or even collapsible, and thus not exposed to the elements of the wild for extended periods of time, it could be best that the one or more sidewall structures comprise the less rigid materials. In those instances where the non rigid materials are used, it might be necessary for semi-rigid or flexible members to define the shape of the one or more sidewall structures 120. For instance, one embodiment exists wherein fiberglass poles, or alternatively tent poles, are used to define the shape of the one or more sidewall structures 120. In this instance, the one or more sidewall structures 120 could removably attach to the base 110, but be installed in a similar manner as a tent might be installed. Furthermore, the one or more sidewall structures 120 might just pop up and into shape like a pop-up tent.

Located within the one or more sidewall structures 120 may be one or more windows 130. The windows 130, in this embodiment, are configured for extending an arrow, a gun barrel or photographic equipment therefrom. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the one or more windows 130 are located in the outwardly slanting portion of the one or more sidewall structures 120. In this embodiment, the slanted sidewall structures 120 cause the windows 130 to be in such geometric arrangement that, while the human can easily see out, typical animals located at ground level have difficulty detecting movement within the interior of the hunting blind 100. More particularly, the geometric arrangement reduces, if not eliminates, silhouetting of the human located therein traditionally caused by the opposing window. To further assist in the reduction of silhouetting, the one or more windows 130 may have adjustable covers that are configured to selectively occlude the window as desired.

The one or more windows 130 may be configured in a number of manners to accomplish the above-described desires. In one embodiment, the one or more windows 130 are configured as a single window surrounding the entire perimeter of the hunting blind 100. Accordingly, the windows 130 provide excellent visibility of the surrounding terrain so that the hunter located therein can observe the animal of interest, regardless of the position of the hunting blind with respect to the animal. In this embodiment, a band of shoot through netting or opaque material could drape over the interior or exterior of the windows, to further prevent silhouetting, while allowing access to the outside of the hunting blind 100. This type of netting may attach to the hunting blind 100 using snaps, Velcro, zippers, magnets, among other fastening means. In yet other embodiments, a plurality of separate windows are positioned at various positions around the exterior of the sidewall structures 120, for example using the adjustable covers discussed above to reduce silhouetting. Likewise, the windows 130 may be configured as a circumferential observation screen with multiple different slots for shooting from.

The hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1 further includes an optional roof structure 140 positioned above the base structure 110. In this embodiment, the one or more sidewall structures 120 are configured to extend between the base structure 110 and the roof structure 140. The optional roof structure 140, similar to the sidewall structures 120, may comprise a variety of materials. Nevertheless, the sidewall structures 120 and roof structure 140, and for that matter the base structure 110, need not all comprise the same material. For example, the roof structure 140 may comprise either a rigid material, such as metal, wood, polymer, etc. or alternatively may comprise a non rigid material such as fabric, plastic, etc. In one advantageous embodiment, the roof structure 140 comprises waterproof and windproof material. The one or more sidewall structures 120 may additionally comprise this waterproof or windproof material.

One embodiment exists wherein the one or more sidewall structures 120 and the roof structure 140 comprise a single integral unit. In this embodiment, the one or more sidewall structures 120 and the roof structure 140 would again act as a tent, for example with or without a base. In either event, the one or more sidewall structures 120 and the roof structure 140 could be deployed in a manner similar to a traditional tent, or could alternatively be deployed in a manner similar to a pop-up tent. In this embodiment, the single unit of the one or more sidewall structures 120 and the roof structure 140 could be quickly deployed on/over the more rigid, but separate, base structure 110. In any such embodiment, attachment features could be used to removably attach the separate base structure 110 to the combined sidewall structures 120 and roof structure 140, when in use. Furthermore, the hunting blind 100 can be configured to adhere to an existing hunting blind or hunting stand, whether it is manufactured by one company or another. Accordingly, in one such embodiment the combined sidewall structures 120 and roof structure 140 would couple directly to an already existing hunting stand or blind. In yet another embodiment, the combined sidewall structures 120 and roof structure 140 would adhere to a tree or post that the already existing hunting stand or blind is using as support, but in doing so would at least partially encompass and employ the already existing hunting stand or blind. For example, in one embodiment wherein an existing hunting stand is attached to a tree, the newly designed hunting blind could attach to the tree a sufficient distance above this existing hunting stand, thereby providing camouflage for the occupant. (See, FIG. 6)

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the roof structure 140 is domed, thus making the hunting blind 100 substantially conical in shape. The term substantially conical, as used herein, refers to the general shape of the hunting blind 100. For example, the footprint of the base structure 110 might be that of a square, and likewise the footprint of the roof structure 140 might be that of a square, but when the square footprint of the base structure 110 and the square footprint of the roof structure 140 are coupled with the one or more sidewall structures 120, the general overall shape of the hunting blind 100 is conical. Therefore, even if the base structure 110 or roof structure 140 include more than four sides, such as if they were pentagonal, hexagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, circular, oval, etc., the general overall shaped of the hunting blind 100 would be considered conical. In other embodiments, however, the roof structure 140 is peaked, flat, or another configuration.

As is illustrated in FIG. 1, the given geometry of the hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1 provides that an area of a footprint of the base structure 110 is less than an area of a footprint of the roof structure 140. In yet another embodiment, such as shown in FIG. 1, the footprint of the base structure 110 is located below, and within, a footprint of the roof structure 140.

A hunting blind, such as the hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1, may include many different optional features. For example, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, the hunting blind 100 includes a seat 150. The seat 150, in this embodiment, is coupled to the base structure 110. More particularly, the seat 150 is removably coupled proximate a centerpoint of the base structure 110. As shown in FIG. 1, the seat 150 may be configured such that a centerpoint thereof is laterally offset from the centerpoint of the base structure 110. Furthermore, the seat 150 may be configured such that it is rotatably coupled about the centerpoint of the base structure 110 as well as rotatably coupled about the lateral offset. The two degrees of rotation allowed by the disclosed seat 150 is helpful for the human within the hunting blind 100 to keep his or her back proximate the back surface of the hunting blind 100. This allows the user room within the hunting blind 100 to safely prepare and fire a weapon (e.g., a bow and arrow or firearm). It is believed that a lateral offset (x) from about 6 to about 12 inches is optimal. In one embodiment, a chair similar to those frequently used in bass boats is used as the seat 150.

In yet another embodiment, two or more seats 150 are located within the hunting blind 100. In this example, the two or more seats 150 may extend from a single post attached to the base structure 110, or alternatively extend from their own posts located at positions offset from the center point of the base structure 110. The embodiments with two or more seats 150 are particularly useful when multiple family members are located within the blind, or alternatively wherein a guide and a hunter are both located within the stand. Obviously, there are certain situations wherein the hunting blind 100 itself will need to be larger to accommodate multiple humans.

The hunting blind 100 may include additional optional features. For instance, the hunting blind 100 could be equipped with a solar power system 160 with or without related battery. In this example, the solar power system 160 could be used to power a small space heater, a portable computer, a cellular phone, lights within the blind, bug zapper, etc. The hunting blind 100 may further include insulation, whether it be in one or more of the base structure 110, one or more sidewall structures 120, and roof structure 140. Additionally, the hunting blind 100 may be bug proof, specifically mosquito proof, whether it be through screens, netting, zippers or otherwise. The hunting blind 100 may further include storage options, such as a bow hanger or camera arm attached to the support system thereof. In this embodiment, the storage options may be moveable within the hunting blind 100. Additionally, the hunting blind 100 could have an odor-absorbing liner placed within an interior thereof, in an attempt to further isolate the human from the animals. In contrast, the material of the hunting blind 100 can be chosen so as to accept and hold an odor-absorbing spray, crystals or other substance. Moreover, an optional lining material, such as a rubber mat, carpet or other noise dampening material may be positioned on the base structure 110 in an attempt to dampen any noise or vibration created by the user's feet or firearm or bow and arrow. Other options, whether currently known or hereafter discovered, including safety mechanisms for keeping the user of the hunting blind from falling therefrom, could equally be used with the hunting blind 100.

The hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1 may further include a fall restraint system 170. As those skilled in the art appreciate, the fall restraint system 170 would be configured to protect the user of the hunting blind 100 from falling there from. For example. The fall restraint system 170 could assist the user while climbing into or out of the hunting blind 100, particularly when the hunting blind 100 is elevated, such as if it were configured as a tripod, quadrapod, tree stand, etc.

A variety of different fall restraint systems 170 are within the purview of the disclosure. For example, in one embodiment, the fall restraint system 170 would have an attachment point 175 and a restraint line 180. The attachment point 175 would typically be coupled to a rigid portion of the hunting blind 100, and the restraint line 180 would extend there from. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1, the attachment point 175 is coupled to the frame of the hunting blind 100. In an exemplary embodiment, the attachment point 175 might be coupled to the frame at a location above the users head, whether in a standing position or seated position. This exemplary feature, would allow for minimal slack between the user and the restraint line 180 regardless of the position or height of the user.

The user of a fall restraint system, such as the fall restraint system 100 of FIG. 1, might wear a harness with a central attachment point. That user could then removably attach a short leader liner between the central attachment point on the harness and a friction hitch attached to the restrain line. In one embodiment, the friction hitch is any one of a number of conventional rock climbing knots, such as a prussic knot. As the user climbs into or out of the hunting blind 100 under control, the friction hitch would slide up or down. However, if the user were to slip and fall, the friction hitch would tighten, and thus grab a hold of the restraint line 180. Accordingly, the user would likely only fall a maximum distance equal to twice a length of the leader line (e.g., maybe only two to four feet). In contrast, if the attachment point 175 were midway up the hunting blind 100, the length of the leader line would need to be significantly longer (e.g., possibly seven to ten feet) to allow the user to reach the top of the hunting blind 100. In this example, the user might fall fourteen to twenty feet before the friction hitch would grab a hold.

A hunting blind, such as the hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1, provides many benefits over its counterparts. First and foremost, the outwardly slanting sidewalls provide the user of the hunting blind more of an opportunity to view animals proximate the base thereof. Accordingly, in those situations wherein an animal need be proximate to the base of the hunting blind before taking a shot, such is often the case with hunting with a bow and arrow, the user of the hunting blind can easily make said shot. In contrast, were the hunting blind to have vertical walls, or even inwardly slanting walls, the user of the hunting blind would be presented with a much more difficult shot on the proximately located animal. Likewise, the peculiar geometry of the hunting blind, with the outwardly slanting walls, allows the hunting blind to be relatively small, thereby decreasing the overall outline of the blind. Furthermore, the combination of the waterproof/windproof roof structure, sidewall structures and base structure, with the superior seat and bug proof nature, offers significant improvement in terms of comfort to the user. These are important features, in that they allow the user to more comfortably and easily hunt on windy or rainy days, or alternatively during warm weather when insects are present, and to sit in the hunting blind for longer periods of time, thus dramatically increasing his or her odds of success.

Turning to FIG. 2, illustrated is an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind 200. The hunting blind 200 of FIG. 2 includes a base structure 210, one or more sidewall structure 220 and a roof structure 230. The one or more sidewall structures 220 of FIG. 2, in contrast to the one or more sidewall structures 120 of FIG. 1, however, are not configured to continuously slant outward from the base structure 210. In this embodiment, the one or more sidewall structures 220 include a first portion 223 that is substantially vertical in nature, and further include a second portion 228 that slants outward from the first portion 223. Accordingly, in this embodiment, only a portion of the one or more sidewall structures 220 slants outward, as opposed to the entire portion shown in FIG. 1. Notice, however, in the embodiment of FIG. 2 the one or more windows 240 are still located within the second slanting portion 228.

Turning to FIG. 3, illustrated is an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind 300. The hunting blind 300 of FIG. 3 includes a base structure 310 and one or more sidewall structure 320. The one or more sidewall structures 320 of FIG. 3 form an enclosure for the hunting blind 300. More specifically, the one or more sidewall structures 320 of FIG. 3 are configured as a bubble. Accordingly, the one or more sidewall structures 320 of FIG. 3 include intentionally curved portions, as opposed to including straight features similar to the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2. It should be noted that while the one or more sidewall structures 320 illustrated in FIG. 3 curve entirely over the top of the occupant, thereby forming the roof structure disclosed in other embodiments, such is not always the case. For instance, one embodiment exists wherein the one or more sidewall structures 320 curve to a point above the users head when seated, and then turn to a flat or peaked roof structure, among others.

The hunting blind 300 of FIG. 3 further includes one or more window openings 330. The one or more window openings 330, in accordance with this disclosure, are located within the one or more sidewall structures. Furthermore, at least one of the one or more window openings 330 angles toward ground level. The phrase “angle toward ground level”, as used herein, is intended to exclude those instances wherein the one or more window openings 330 are located perpendicular to the ground or angling toward the sky.

Turning to FIG. 4, illustrated is the hunting blind 100 of FIG. 1, further including an optional and detachable elevating structure 410 coupled to the base structure 110. The elevating structure 410, as shown, is configured to elevate the hunting blind 100, or a hunting blind manufactured in accordance with this disclosure, above ground level. As the hunting blind is elevated above ground level, the user thereof has a better vantage point for success. The elevating structure 410, depending on the use thereof, can be configured to elevate the hunting blind 100 up to tens of feet up in the air. The elevating structure 410 of FIG. 1 is configured as a tripod or quadrapod. Nevertheless, any configuration of three or more legs could be employed. In this embodiment, the individual legs of the elevating structure 410 may be configured to telescope in length, thereby providing the user of the hunting blind a number of different optional heights.

Also illustrated in FIG. 4 is a fall restraint system, such as the fall restraint system 170 illustrated in FIG. 1. In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 4, the restraint line 180 is attached to the ground. For example, a ground anchor 420 might be used to securely attach the restraint line 180 to the ground.

It is additionally important that the hunting blind 100 and elevating structure 410 be structurally sound such that the fall restraint system 170 is safe and effective to use. For example, the hunting blind 100 and elevating structure 410 should be designed so that the fall restraint system 170 can be employed by a fairly large user without the risk of the hunting blind 100 and elevating structure 410 tipping over. In one exemplary embodiment, additional ground anchors 420 may be attached to legs of the elevating structure 410 to prevent tipping of the hunting blind 100. In certain other embodiments, the legs of the elevating structure 410 are in such a number or at such angles that tipping is unlikely. Additionally, the overall weight of the hunting blind 100 and elevating structure 410 could be designed to substantially prevent tipping.

Turning to FIG. 5, illustrated is an embodiment wherein the hunting blind 100 is elevated using a ladder stand 510. In this embodiment, the ladder stand is leaning against a tree or post 520. The leg or legs of the ladder stand 510, similar to the legs of the elevating structure 410, may telescope in length. Likewise, the ladder stand 510 is configured as an optional, and removable, feature. The embodiment of FIG. 5 further illustrates that a fall restraint system, such as the fall restraint system 170 of FIG. 1, might be employed.

Turning to FIG. 6, illustrated is an embodiment wherein the hunting blind 100 is configured to couple directly to a tree or post 610 (e.g., hang directly therefrom), and therefore elevate the hunting blind 100 above ground level without the use of an elevating structure. This is in direct contrast to the embodiments of FIGS. 4 and 5. The mechanism configured to attach the hunting blind 100 directly to the tree or post 610 may be rounded or v-shaped in nature, to better approximate the shape and circumference of the tree or post 610. Likewise, it may include optional leveling means, so as to allow the base structure 110 to be mounted in a horizontal configuration, even if the tree or post is leaning. Those skilled in the art understand the leveling means that could be used. The embodiment of FIG. 6 further illustrates that a fall restraint system, such as the fall restraint system 170 of FIG. 1, might be employed.

Turning briefly to FIG. 7, illustrated is an embodiment wherein the hunting blind 700 substantially surrounds a tree or post 710. As discussed above, certain embodiments exist wherein a base structure 720 of the hunting blind 700 is a preexisting structure. In this embodiment, the one or more sidewall structures 730 and roof structure 740 would retrofit with the preexisting base structure 720. Accordingly, in one embodiment the one or more sidewall structures 730 and roof structure 740 would attach directly to the base structure 720 itself. However, in yet another embodiment the one or more sidewall structures 730 and roof structure 740 would attach to the tree or post 710, and in essence drape over the base structure 730. This type of embodiment is useful whether the hunting blind is configured to substantially surround the tree or post 710, or not. Likewise, this embodiment is useful whether the hunting blind is a ladder stand or independently hanging. The embodiment of FIG. 7 further illustrates that a fall restraint system, such as the fall restraint system 170 of FIG. 1, might be employed.

Turning briefly to FIGS. 8 and 9, illustrated is an alternative embodiment of a hunting blind 800. The hunting blind 800, in addition to the other modifications shown, embodies somewhat of a mushroom shape. Accordingly, the hunting blind 800 of FIGS. 8 and 9, includes a base structure 810, as well as sidewall structures 820 and a roof structure 830, both of which are positioned over the base structure 810. The sidewall structures 820, in this embodiment, includes a first portion 823 that is coupled to the base structure and extends substantially perpendicular to the base structure, and a second portion 828 that couples to the first portion 823 and slants outwardly from the first portion 823. In the illustrated embodiment, the second portion 828 slants outwardly in the form of an arc, but the second portion 828 could just as easily slant outwardly in a straight line (see FIG. 2). In the illustrated embodiment, the roof structure 830 couples to the second portion 828 of the sidewall structures 820.

Although the present disclosure has been described in detail, those skilled in the art should understand that they can make various changes, substitutions and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure in its broadest form. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A hunting blind, comprising: a base structure configured to support the weight of a human; one or more sidewall structures coupleable to the base structure, wherein the one or more sidewall structures include a first portion extending upwardly from the base structure, and a second portion that slants outwardly from the first portion; and a roof structure positioned over the base structure and coupled to the second portion.
 2. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the first portion extends substantially perpendicular to the base structure.
 3. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the second portion slants outwardly in the form of an arc.
 4. The hunting blind as recited in claim 3, wherein one or more windows are located in the second portion.
 5. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein one or more windows are located in the second portion.
 6. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the roof structure is a domed roof structure.
 7. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the base structure, one or more sidewall structures and roof structure cooperate to allow the human to shoot a bow and arrow at an object located below the base structure.
 8. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, furthering including conforming material surrounding the roof structure, and one or more sidewall structures.
 9. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, further including an elevating structure coupleable to the base structure and configured to elevate the hunting blind above ground level.
 10. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, further including a seat coupled proximate a centerpoint of the base structure, wherein a centerpoint of the seat is laterally offset from the centerpoint of the base structure.
 11. The hunting blind as recited in claim 10 wherein the seat is rotatably coupled about the centerpoint of the base and rotatable coupled about the lateral offset.
 12. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the roof structure is integrally formed with and attached to the one or more sidewall structures.
 13. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1, wherein the roof structure and sidewall structures comprise a rigid polymer material.
 14. The hunting blind as recited in claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the second portion angles outward by at least 10 degrees. 